<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Altporn ‘A&#039; List Alexa: Feb 01, 2007	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://altporn.net/news/2007/02/01/altporn-a-list-alexa-feb-01-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://altporn.net/news/2007/02/01/altporn-a-list-alexa-feb-01-2007/</link>
	<description>Alternative Subculture Erotica - alt.porn</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 09:28:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Truant		</title>
		<link>https://altporn.net/news/2007/02/01/altporn-a-list-alexa-feb-01-2007/#comment-365</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Truant]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 05:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://altporn.net/2007/02/01/altporn-%e2%80%98a%e2%80%99-list-alexa-feb-01-2007/#comment-365</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[No, solo or single girls sites are not included in this particular measure. Partly, it becomes much more difficult to qualify a single girl site as being specifically in or out of the genre, so they are less of a measure of the genre as a whole. There are single girl sites we like and find appealing, and we do what we can to get the word out about what they have going on, but they are not so much about what the general or multigirl community alt sites are about, if that makes any sense. At least it seems harshly judgemental to start having to be like this specific girl is alt and that specific girl is not. Even if we did decide to do a top ten or twenty alt-girl sites, it probably wouldn&#039;t make sense to base it on Alexa.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, solo or single girls sites are not included in this particular measure. Partly, it becomes much more difficult to qualify a single girl site as being specifically in or out of the genre, so they are less of a measure of the genre as a whole. There are single girl sites we like and find appealing, and we do what we can to get the word out about what they have going on, but they are not so much about what the general or multigirl community alt sites are about, if that makes any sense. At least it seems harshly judgemental to start having to be like this specific girl is alt and that specific girl is not. Even if we did decide to do a top ten or twenty alt-girl sites, it probably wouldn&#8217;t make sense to base it on Alexa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: anna		</title>
		<link>https://altporn.net/news/2007/02/01/altporn-a-list-alexa-feb-01-2007/#comment-364</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anna]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 04:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://altporn.net/2007/02/01/altporn-%e2%80%98a%e2%80%99-list-alexa-feb-01-2007/#comment-364</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t know if you check single-girl sites or not, but my Alexa ranking is more than halfway up that page: 134,462.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if you check single-girl sites or not, but my Alexa ranking is more than halfway up that page: 134,462.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
