Comments on: DVD Review: Joanna’s Angels 2 – Alt.Throttle

By: Leila

Leila — Mon, 11 Sep 2006 18:44:46 +0000

Sounds like a waste of money, but then again I’m the kind of person who would rather watch a vivid video than amature porn. And I really respect vivid for having their actors use condoms.

By: Darkseid

Darkseid — Sat, 09 Sep 2006 05:44:02 +0000

First, let me say that I am very happy to see that someone cares enough to have left a comment. Thank you.

But, actually, I did get the point of the movie. I just think that it’s stupid. You say, “it’s a feature,” as if it were “Citizen Kane” or something. It’s not. It’s a porno. And as such, it should be sexy and appeal to the prurient interest of the viewer. If I want to watch something goofy and silly, as I often do, I’ll crack open my “Monty Python” box set.
Pornos should not have plots.
But if they must, then how about a good one? Or good acting, lighting, direction, cinematography, or good anything?
This simply isn’t a very well made film.
Although, I suppose if your only requirement for a porno is silliness, then… well, then this one could have been a hell of a lot funnier.

By: Jessica

Jessica — Tue, 05 Sep 2006 17:00:56 +0000

To each their own, but I was fairly certain when I first started reading this review that you were missing the point and this line pretty much confirmed that suspicion: “In another insane scene Joanna is dancing to some unimaginably shitty pop/boy-band song, I guess, and her preppy, jock, douchebag boyfriend shows up to dump her for being — and I quote — “too alt.” Holy hell, that’s the lamest thing I’ve heard all year.”
The move is DELIBERATELY goofy and silly. That’s what Joanna does. She comes up with the goofiest concepts possible. The movie is making fun of itself and making fun of alt porn. As for the plot – it’s a feature. All features have plot. It’s not a gonzo flick.